Henry David
Thoreau writes, “We love eloquence for its own sake, and not for any truth
which it may utter, or any heroism it may inspire”. For those who do not know, according to the Merriam-Webster
Dictionary, eloquence is “the
quality of forceful or persuasive expressiveness”. Thoreau believed that
people did not fully absorb the meaning behind what was written or spoken to
inspire them and simply took no action towards their standing beliefs.
However,
I cannot deem this philosophy to be true when in consideration of the protests occurring
around events such as Black Lives Matter. Although we may love eloquence
because it sounds nice, we also see it as the call to action or attention it
can be. Contrary to Thoreau’s belief,
eloquence is used in many speeches towards inspiring action for Black Lives
Matter and brings it into the light causing action to occur. Senator Elizabeth
Warren spoke of how black’s “pervasive” and “persistent” distrust is not based
upon “myths”. Government officials speaking out on the topic has created
heroism among citizens and riled the people to protest and fight for what they believe
is right. They are not merely sitting around and waiting for someone to prove
that we, the people of the United States, are all equal. Protests have broken
out in Atlanta, Philadelphia, Phoenix, New York City, San Francisco, and many
more. How could it be denied that words create change? They are used as the
matches to a person's passion and are the cause of our actions.

I really liked how you took what was said in the text and related it to a current event. I think you did a really good job contradicting what Henry David Thoreau said by backing it up with an actual event.
ReplyDelete